... « tëQũilå Pĩńk ŗŎşë » ...


"A profusion of pink roses bending ragged in the rain speaks to me of all gentleness and its enduring."

~ William Carlos Williams

Friday, February 23, 2007

QotW5: Online Identities - Emails 

With the internet and technology so accessible and advanced now, it is so easy to create an online identity. In fact, one can have multiple identities. For me, just for email, I have a few identities, because one unique email address gives me one unique identity and since I have 5 email addresses so I have 5 email identities. But how true are we with the information that we provide these email services? Do we provide all the correct information of ourselves or do we just fake our information across.

Perhaps, the amount of truth that we put into email information depends on the purposes that we have for that email. For example, if I have created this email for school and work, the amount of information that I put into the email account about myself is definitely true and perhaps all fields of my personal information will be filled. But if this email is created for my gaming purposes, I’ll never put all my personal information in. In fact, that email account that I have created for gaming purposes would be quite anonymous.

As you can know, email accounts are set up so easily nowadays, spam email accounts are also set up easily too. People are abusing the use of email accounts! Compared to the physical world, it is relatively easy to pass as someone else online since there are relatively few identity cues (Donath, 1996).


This is one example of a spam mail that I have recently received. This lucky spam mail escaped in my spam filter and appeared in my inbox. But why do people spam especially through emails? Email accounts are free and easy to sign up and more importantly, you get the email account instantly. There is no waiting time. Email is also very cheap to send, in fact, if you are using those free accounts from Yahoo or Google, they are free to use but with limitations to the amount of mails you send in a day to prevent users from spamming. People spam for business, for popularity, for acknowledgement, for advertisements and the more lethal ones, spam viruses.

The first commercial spamming, “Green Card Spam”, appeared in March 5, 1994, where a pair of lawyers began using bulk Usenet posting to advertise immigration law services. The pair went on to promote spamming of both Usenet and email as a new means of advertisement. Within a few years, the focus of spamming and anti-spam efforts moved chiefly to email, where it remains up till today (“Spam (Electronic)”, 2007).

According to Wikipedia, ensuring a valid identity on an email has become a vital first step in stopping spam. An essential second step will be ensuring the entity has a good reputation (“E-Mail Authentication”, 2007). But I personally feel, it is quite a difficult task on ensuring valid identities in email, as I myself have several anonymous email accounts to protect myself from my personal information. But as long as I do not abuse the services of the email, I believe it’s alright as I’m protecting myself.

References:

Spam (Electronic). (2007, February 21). Wikipedia: The free encyclopedia. Retrieved February 23, 2007 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_mail#Messaging_spam

Donath, J.S. (1996, November 12). Identity and Deception in the Virtual Community. Retrieved February 23, 2007 from http://smg.media.mit.edu/people/Judith/Identity/IdentityDeception.html

E-mail Authentication. (2007, February 10). Wikipedia: The free encyclopedia. Retrieved February 23, 2007 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-mail_authentication

Labels:

Posted by ŠãBŕĩŊå @ 9:47 AM | Link

Saturday, February 17, 2007

my new "pets"... 

Yeah.. i've adopted 2 new pets, pinky and penpen. Guess i was too bored.. ha ha.. was sick for the past few days, fever n flu, and now, my nose is blocked all day!!!! everything taste so tasteless to me.... BLEND WORLD!!!!!! sick for chinese new year, damn suay lor!!!!! aiyoh... sick until hay-wired already.... ha ha... *blurZ*
Posted by ŠãBŕĩŊå @ 12:28 AM | Link

Saturday, February 10, 2007

photo albums are back ! HooRAy!!! 

Yeah! I got my photo albums back but, hmmm.. lost AFL Match 2 photos, BUT will upload again... or i didn't upload at all? hmm...

I have added AFL Match 3 photos... delayed... noel & james have been asking from me for a long time... so sorry guys...

qiuxian & me!

Qiuxian's the lady boss of RoseBayFlowers, you can find the link to her webbie at my link list. Makes very nice n classy flowers. Lurve them! Dun believe? Click and you will find out!!! ha ha.. End of advertisement....

Posted by ŠãBŕĩŊå @ 4:55 PM | Link

QotW4: AnimeSuki and Me ... 

An Introduction to Gift Economy

What is the notion of a gift economy? According to Wikipedia (“Gift Economy”, 2007), a gift economy is an economic system in which the prevalent mode of exchange is for goods and services to be given without explicit agreement upon a quid pro quo (the Latin term for the concept of "a favor for a favor". That is, the rule of reciprocity is not expected in a gift economy. The rule of reciprocity requires that one person try to repay, what another person has provided (Cialdini, 1985).

An Example of a Gift Economy

Anime groups are a great example for gift economies. One anime group that I often patronize is AnimeSuki (AnimeSuki, 2007) and I shall use AnimeSuki as my main idea of a gift economy for this assignment. I visit this anime group a lot because I felt that this is the most comprehensive, has the most anime fans participating, and most importantly, AnimeSuki is regularly updated, thus if I want information on the latest anime, I would definitely get information as people will be discussing it over at the forums.


Justification of AnimeSuki as an Example of a Gift Economy

Rheinegold has described interaction in one online community as consisting of a gift economy, in which help and information is offered without the expectation of any direct, immediate quid-pro-quo. That is, free help and information were given out to complete strangers whom one might never meet again (as cited in Kollock, 1999). In AnimeSuki, there is a forum whereby the community of AnimeSuki will be answering to all your questions. The forum is split up into 4 main subjects, ‘Anime Discussion’, ‘Anime Related Topics’, ‘AnimeSuki & Technology’ and ‘General’. For example if I want to find out what are the current most popular anime that is currently airing, I will choose Anime Discussion’s ‘Current Series’. There, they list the current most popular anime and I can choose which one I’m interested in. And let say I have any questions to ask, I can post and ask a questions and the friendly and helpful anime fans will reply to my question with no strings attached.

Another great part of AnimeSuki is that I get to download the latest Anime. But there’s something that I need to clarify first, which is the licensing of anime which affects the copyright law. As explained in AnimeSuki (“Licensed Anime”, 2007), the copyright law is definitely violated under the WTO Trips Agreement, but the TRIPS agreement does not demand that distribution of copyrighted material is a criminal offence unless it is done on a commercial sale meaning that it is up to the copyright holder to bring the offence to court. AnimeSuki added that fansub groups like AnimeSuki do not have to worry about the legal pressure from Japan but rather from the US companies as they are more likely to sue. Thus, if something is licensed, the licensee holds the copyright and thus the right to sue any copyright infringers within the area covered by the license. Thus, AnimeSuki only provide links to unlicensed anime and they do also keep an updated list of licensed and unlicensed anime. But who provides the links to all these Bit Torrents? Animesuki does not, but anime fan do. AnimeSuki link to sites of the anime fan and not the Bit Torrents files directly. And these anime fans are generous to share their files with other anime fans through fansubs like AnimeSuki.

Thus, AnimeSuki, is an online community, which provides help and information to complete strangers - in which these strangers accidentally or deliberately browse upon AnimeSuki, through links or searches - without any obligations.

Why People Contribute?

One question that ponders upon me a lot is why people contribute. Kollock (Kollock, 1999) explained that there are motivations for contributing. The motivating factors that intrigue people to contribute are anticipated reciprocity, reputation, sense of efficacy, need and attachment. And these motivating factors are rest on self-interest.

People contribute because they hope that when they need help, others will help them back, and this is anticipated reciprocity. Kollock (Kollock, 1999), states that someone should not simply take without ever contributing to the group and that people who regularly offer advice and information seem to receive more help more quickly when they ask for something. Thus people are more willing to contribute, in favor of hoping that when one day they need help, people will help.

By presenting high quality information, impressive technical details in one’s answers, a willingness to help others and elegant writing, could help increase one’s prestige or rather reputation in a community. Thus, thus the desire for prestige urges people to contribute more.

A sense of efficacy is a sense that an individual has some effect on the community’s environment. Thus by making regular and high-quality contribution to a community, it will show to the community that this person is an efficacious people, through the image that the individual portrays to the community.

One may contribute because the community or a person needs it. Thus, if there’s a need for something, an individual might contribute or produce something that the person or community needs to satisfy that need.

Last but not the least, the attachment or rather commitment one can have to the group are also motivating factors for people to contribute. People feels attached to the community and feels that he or she must do the utmost for the community.

Conclusion


I’m glad that gift economies, such as AnimeSuki exists. Because of their existence, people could find answers to their questions easily. Everyone benefits from it. I would no longer fret over a problem because I know where I can go to, especially for questions on anime.

---------------------------------------------------------------


References:

AnimeSuki. (2007). AnimeSuki Forum. Retrieved February 10, 2007, from
http://forums.animesuki.com/

AnimeSuki. (2007). Licensed Anime @ AnimeSuki.com. Retrieved February 10, 2007, from
http://www.animesuki.com/doc.php/licensed/

Cialdini, R. B. (1985). Study: Recruitment, Influence/Ciadini. Retrieved February 10, 2007, from
http://www.csj.org/studyindex/studyrecruit/study_influence.htm

Gift Economy. (2007, February 4). Wikipedia: The free encyclopedia. Retrieved February 10, 2007, from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gift_economy

Kollock, P. (1999). The economies of online cooperation: Gifts and public goods in cyberspace. Retrieved February 10, 2007, from
http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/soc/faculty/kollock/papers/economies.htm

Labels:

Posted by ŠãBŕĩŊå @ 3:11 PM | Link

mia ?? 

it has been days since i've updated my blog! have been so busy with school (not really, i think) and bla bla bla... no frets, tomorrow is my assignment due date again, and once again, my blog will be filled with a gigantic chunk of words.

Went to Taka's Hugo Boss to help today, they claimed that they were short-handed but, ha ha, that's not the case. I was so busy! Taka's HB is so much bigger than my Paragon's shop, at least 5 times bigger. The store is way bigger than ours! Imagine in Taka, not only the carry black label, but they also carry red, orange and green label, and the FULL range of black label as compared to Paragon's, ha ha, it's nothing!!! Really a great experience! Suddenly, i missed Paragon's HB badly, very badly! ha ha.. still preferred the cosy Hugo Boss @ Paragon.

oh well.. i have to rest early, have to get up early "tomorrow" or rather later, to get on with my "question of the week" assignment.. oh no...

and i aim to:
  • finish my COM125 Assignment
  • update my blog's features that have been left stagnant for quite some time
  • and most importantly, catch up with my beauty sleep!!!!!!!

Posted by ŠãBŕĩŊå @ 1:14 AM | Link

Sunday, February 4, 2007

Blog revamp!!! 

Finally. Finally i've figured out how to add on a customized template. I've been figuring it since i started this blogger account. I've always wanted something different, thus finally, i've found something different and more tedious. Draining man... My crap box, my link list, my counter is still not completed yet... Oh Well... have to do it another day. BUT i'm so happy! i've managed to change my blog skin!!!! YEAH! Kudos! ^_^
Posted by ŠãBŕĩŊå @ 2:11 AM | Link

dessert!!! 

This is one dessert that i have to share with everyone!!! i just had this at the American Club. Had some Chinese fusion food with my family and my dad's friends. Food was good, but i loved the dessert the most!!!!! This dessert is mainly aloe vera and ice jelly set in a glass cone. Under the glass cone comes the bubbling dry ice, settled in chrysanthemum and Chinese tea giving the cooling effect to the contents in the cone. Adorned with a scoop of lime sorbet, a stalk of mint leaves and lemon, it looks simply wonderful. The tangy, sour taste of the lime sorbet, compliments the sweet and chewy aloe vera and the gelatine ice jelly. Simply mouthwatering, simply delicious. Yummy !
Posted by ŠãBŕĩŊå @ 12:03 AM | Link

Saturday, February 3, 2007

spring-summer is here!!! 

Peepz... Spring-Summer 2007 is here!!! Aren't you glad? The new season with a whole new range! Most importantly, Spring-Summer collection is something that adapts to our climate in Singapore, rather than spring-winter. Ha ha! Check out Hugo Boss, Louis Vuitton and Gucci with their latest collection. Very nice!
Posted by ŠãBŕĩŊå @ 5:28 PM | Link

QotW3: Sharing, Copyright and Creative Culture 

People want to communicate with one another, and they love to share (Litman, 2003). But issues of file-sharing especially music files, are causing a big stir now. Recently, “a 16-year-old boy was being sued by five record companies accusing of online music piracy”. He was alleged of disseminating music. When Patti Santangelo was sued by the record companies in 2005, his mother refused to settle the case but rather, took the case public and became a heroine to supporters of Internet Freedom. The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), stated that, “The record industry has suffered enormously due to piracy. That includes thousand of layoffs. We must protect our rights.” (“NY Boy Sued by Music Companies Responds”, 2007). Both content creators and the public feels that each have their own right, but, who ultimately has the rightful rights? This debate has been going on for a period of time but there is not any conclusion. How can we create a win-win situation that accommodates both the interests of content creators and the public good? How are we going to achieve that?

According to a research article by Litman (Litman, 2003), a number of scholars have floated proposals that urged the adoption of systems that would permit peer-to-peer file sharing, charging money to the people who enjoy it and thus generating money in which businesses can profit from it and these money could also be used to compensate creators and copyright owners. I feel that this is the best solution currently as the public still get to share their files but at a minimal fee, and the record industry still gets their profits and commission from their middlemen (websites or peer-to-peer file sharing programs), who hosts these file-sharing activities. This solution puts the public, the middlemen, the record industries in a win-win situation and this could even create a new avenue for profits for the record industries-selling their music online.

You might feel that record-sales will drop due to file-sharing but, from an empirical analysis on “The Effect of File Sharing on Record Sales” (Oberholzer-Gee and Strumpf, 2005), Oberholzer-Gee and Strumpf had concluded from the use of detailed records of transfer of digital music files, file sharing sharing has no statistically significant effect on purchases of the average album. File sharing is not responsible for the majority of lost sales. Other factors, such as poor macroeconomic conditions, the change in how music is distributed and the ending of a period of atypically high sales when consumers replace music old music formats with Compact Discs, the growing competition from other forms of entertainment, are plausible candidates for the loss of record sales.

Napster and online website, mp3search.com are excellent examples who had used to allow free downloading and uploading of music and video files. Then, both have been forced to cease operation but now, they are operating based on another aspect, by making their customers pay for subscriptions and the files that their customers download. I found an interesting segment off mp3search.com about information on using peer-to-peer software safely (mp3search.com, 2006), where they state that the purchase of a membership with mp3search.com, however is not a license to upload or download copyrighted material and that mp3search.com urge the users to respect copyright and share responsibly. Then, it links to show a small segment of disclaimer about copyright infringement which links to another article that teaches the users how to minimize copyright infringement using their peer-2-peer software. Evidently, mp3search.com wish not to get involved with any more of copyright issues that they used to have thus the disclaimers.

(Source: http://www.mp3search.com)

Napster do also have a similar problem about file-sharing before but now they had worked with Microsoft and have embedded a new function, a Napster Online Store, into the new Windows Media Player whereby users can download music at a fee through Windows Media Player, just like iTunes, a similar program by Apple, that manages one’s music library and also sells licensed music at a fee.
How can we not get sued for file sharing? Is it possible? From an article from the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) (EFF, 2006), EFF advises users to make sure that there are no potentially infringing files in the shared folder, remove all potentially misleading file names that might confuse with the name of an RIAA artist or song and disable the ‘Sharing’ or ‘Uploading’ function of the peer-2-peer application. EFF has also created a petition against RIAA from filing legal suits, to propose as a solution to get artists paid while protecting peer-2-peer file sharing and instead of RIAA filing endless lawsuits, create a rational, legal means by which its customers can take advantage of file sharing technology and pay a fair price for the music they love (EFF:RIAA Petition, 2006).

By making the public pay for their music and recording industries do their part by allowing file-sharing but with terms and conditions could salvage the situation of finding a win-win situation for everyone. Only through this, then the subject of illegal file-sharing could be put to an end.

------------------------------------------------------------------

REFERENCES:

Litman, Jessica, (2003, November 23). Sharing and Stealing, Social Science Research Network, 4, 31. Retrieved January 18, 2007, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=472141.

Associated Press. (2007, January 31). NY Boy Sued by Music Companies Responds. Yahoo! Asia News. Retrieved on February 3, 2007, from http://asia.news.yahoo.com/070131/ap/d8n01oj01.html.

Oberholzer-Gee, F., & Strumpf, K. (2005, June). The Effect of File Sharing on Record Sales; An Empirical Analysis. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 35-36. Retrieved January 18, 2007 from http://www.unc.edu/~cigar/papers/FileSharing_June2005_final.pdf.

Mp3search.com. (2006). Information on using p2p safely. Mp3search.com. Retrieved February 3, 2007 from http://mp3search.com/.

EFF. (2006). How to Not Get Sued for File Sharing. Electronic Frontier Foundation. Retrieved February 3, 2007 from http://www.eff.org/IP/P2P/howto-notgetsued.php.

EFF. (2006). RIAA Petition. Electronic Frontier Foundation. Retrieved February 3, 2007 from http://www.eff.org/share/petition/.

Labels:

Posted by ŠãBŕĩŊå @ 4:15 PM | Link